Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilkins

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1976No. Crim. 75-436PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

Herbert Wilkins was convicted by a jury of kidnapping, 1 violating the Mann Act, 2 and conspiracy to commit these offenses. He has filed post-trial motions asserting there was improper denial of pre-trial discovery, prejudice from my asking questions of a government witness, prosecutorial misconduct, and error in the jury charge. For the reasons which follow, defendant’s motions will be denied.

The evidence adduced at trial, viewed, as it must be, in a light most favorable to the prosecution, Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 469, 86 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wilkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  5. Rex v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API