East St. Louis Cotton Oil Co. v. Skinner Bros. Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action by the Skinner Brothers Manufacturing Company against the East St. Louis Cotton Oil Company, which counterclaimed. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Skinner Bros., as plaintiff, sued the Oil Company, as defendant, to recover $4,594.79, upon an account, a copy of which was attached to the complaint. The items of the account consisted of charges for time, labor, and material. The defendant answered the complaint by a general denial and counterclaim. The counterclaim alleged that the plaintiff and defendant on or about Eebrúary 15, 1916, entered into an agreement whereby plaintiff agreed, for the sum of $1,400, to build, install, and erect at defendant’s place of business in a good and workmanlike manner and with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nalle v. OysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Board of Comm'rs of City and County of Denver v. Home Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mitchell v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Gwin v. GwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Ruth v. McPhersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Osborn v. Chandeysson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Weinstein v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Boe v. Marvel Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933