Legal Opinion

Love v. Modern Woodmen of America

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appear from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Ebrrhardt, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The appellant, the Modern Woodmen of America, issued its benefit certificate, dated November 29, 1909, signed by C. W. Hawes, head clerk, to Nathan D. Love, a member of the local camp in Chicago, for $1000, payable on his death to his wife, the appellee, Nellie Love. Less than two months afterward he died, on January 15, 1910, and she brought this suit on the certificate in the municipal court of Chicago, stating her claim to be for $1000, as beneficiary. The certificate provided that no action should be maintained upon it until after proofs of death had been filed with the head clerk and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. High Court Independent Order of Foresters v. SchweitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dwelling House Insurance v. DowdallIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ferrero v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Keil Motor Co. v. Royal Insurance Co., Ltd., of LiverpoolSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  3. Turner v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  4. Martin v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Palmeter v. Court of HonorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API