Legal Opinion
Oklahoma-Arkansas Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 29, 1930No. 19907PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, or the Poteau Company, and the defendant in error as defendant, or the Bell Company, as the context will require.
The Poteau Company owns and operates telephone properties consisting of exchanges at Poteau, Heavener, Howe, and Wister, in Oklahoma, with toll lines connecting those exchanges with each other and with the exchange of the Bell Company at Forth Smith, Ark. The Bell Company has toll lines connecting its stations throughout the United States. One of those lines extends from Fort Smith, Ark., to Poteau, Okla., where a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Pioneer Tel. Tel. Co. v. State and HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Pioneer Tel. Tel. Co. v. State, MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lemhi Telephone Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Southwestern Light & Power Co. v. City of ElkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Gibson v. Elmore City Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.