Legal Opinion

Palm v. Kulesza

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 24, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

These are actions of tort to recover for personal injuries and also in the case of Charles Palm for property damage. The actions were tried to a jury with three similar actions brought by the same plaintiffs against Three Springs Fisheries Company. There were verdicts for the defendants in all the cases, the verdicts in the instant cases being returned by orders of the court. The cases are here on the respective exceptions of the plaintiffs to these orders and to an evidential ruling made during the course of the trial.

The actions arose out of a collision of automobiles on the so called…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Solomon v. DabrowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Feore v. TrammelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Ouellette v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Prouty Lumber & Box Co. v. CoganOregon Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MandevilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. G.E.B. v. S.R.W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Agoos Leather Companies, Inc. v. American & Foreign InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. H. E. Fletcher Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API