Legal Opinion
Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1977No. L.A. 30703PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANUEL, J.
In this action for recovery of ad valorem personal property taxes paid under protest, defendants City of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles appeal from a judgment entered after a nonjury trial in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants for the recovery of said taxes together with interest and costs. After decision by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three, reversing the judgment, we granted a hearing in this court for the purpose of giving further consideration to the issues raised. Having made a thorough examination of the cause, we have…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Clyde Mallory Lines v. Alabama Ex Rel. State Docks CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Cox v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sunset Drive Corp. v. City of RedlandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- New Plumbing Contractors, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- City of Valdez v. Polar Tankers, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- GeoMetrics v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.