Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sunset Drive Corp. v. City of Redlands

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1999No. E022234PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Sunset Drive Corporation (Sunset) appeals from the dismissal of its action after demurrers were sustained without leave to amend to its combined petition for writ of mandate and complaint for damages for the violation of its civil rights. Finding that the facts alleged by Sunset are sufficient to state claims for mandate and damages, we reverse.

Procedural Background

Sunset filed its action in May of 1996 against the City of Redlands and its city council (collectively, Redlands or the defendants). Alleged in two counts, it sought a writ of mandate, ordering the defendants to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Vedanta Society of Southern California v. California Quartet Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API