Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Gagnon

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1929No. Docket No. 3658PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment growing out of facts of which the following is a sufficient statement: In July, 1924, the defendant Gagnon doing business under the name of Affiliated Enterprises, secured an option on a tract of about thirteen and one-half acres of land in the city of Los Angeles. To exercise the option and purchase the land, he proceeded to organize a “syndicate” to which he transferred his option and which proceeded to purchase the property. The plaintiffs were members of the syndicate as was Gagnon, his interest being given to him as part of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Barr v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guillory v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Minehan v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. De Gonia v. Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers Local Union 420California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. De Gonia v. Building Material Etc. UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Hughes v. HeffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API