Legal Opinion

Minnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 9, 1961No. 179PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Storey, J.:

This is a revised opinion filed as the result of a reargument on a motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff-insured brought this action to recover benefits which he alleges are due to him under the terms of a comprehensive automobile insurance policy. (By “comprehensive”, I mean general in scope, including liability, collision, medical and various other types of coverage.) Defendant-insurer has moved for summary judgment upon the premise that the policy was not in force on the day of the accident.

For the purpose of this motion, the following essential facts are undisputed. On May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Primeau v. National Life Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Pester v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Delaware Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. SECIRITY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brandywine Shoppe, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API