Legal Opinion

Muzzio v. Steele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 25PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In this action, plaintiffs, — who are the surface owners of land underlaid with coal, and who never owned the *228coal, unless it attached to their surface title by reason of the failure of those who did own it to completely mine it out, — seek to recover not only damages to the surface due to the removal of supporting pillars, but treble damages for removing and converting the coal itself. They recovered a verdict for the damage done to the surface, but were denied recovery by the court below for the coal mined out; their appeal is from the decision as to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkey v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Huss v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Streng v. Buck Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sparrow v. Airport Parking Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Hummel v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Camp Chicopee v. EdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Town of Kearny v. MUN. SAN. LANDFILL AUTH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. McKelvy v. Wilkinsburg Domestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API