Muzzio v. Steele
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
In this action, plaintiffs, — who are the surface owners of land underlaid with coal, and who never owned the *228coal, unless it attached to their surface title by reason of the failure of those who did own it to completely mine it out, — seek to recover not only damages to the surface due to the removal of supporting pillars, but treble damages for removing and converting the coal itself. They recovered a verdict for the damage done to the surface, but were denied recovery by the court below for the coal mined out; their appeal is from the decision as to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berkey v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Huss v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Streng v. Buck Run Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sparrow v. Airport Parking Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Hummel v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Camp Chicopee v. EdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Town of Kearny v. MUN. SAN. LANDFILL AUTH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- McKelvy v. Wilkinsburg Domestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.