Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 24, 1995No. NMCM 94 00006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Senior Judge:

This case originally came before us as a merit submission, the appellant alleging no error in the court-martial proceedings. However, our examination of the record showed that, although the appellant had asked to be tried by officer members (record at 5), the military judge acted as the sentencing authority after accepting the appellant’s guilty pleas. There was never a request on the record, either orally or in writing, by the appellant for trial by judge alone. We subsequently ordered the Government to show cause why the findings and sentence should not be set aside since…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MayfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. TurnerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API