Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Murray v. Holmes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1930No. 20263. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Dunn

The circuit court of Clinton county denied the petition of the State’s attorney for leave to file an information in the nature of quo warranto against B. F. Holmes and four others charging them with usurpation of the offices of members of the board of education of Sandoval Community High School District, and the petitioners have appealed.

The facts upon which the information was based were shown by the petition for leave to file, and an affidavit in support of it, as follows: A petition for the organization of the district was filed with the county superintendent of schools of Marion county on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. People Ex Rel. Fyfe v. BarnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Graham v. DyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People ex rel. Cole v. KinseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People ex rel. Harvey v. VaughanIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The People v. Chi. Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People Ex Rel. Denny v. TraegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. NortonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Prewitt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API