Lee Carrell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
Carrell was convicted after a bench trial of simple assault1 and attempted threats to do bodily harm.2 He appeals the portion of the judgment relating to attempted threats to do bodily harm; he does not challenge his assault conviction.3 He urges us to hold that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that he intended to threaten the victim, Ringen-burg, a finding that he contends the trial judge never made, although required to do so. We affirm.
I
On January 10, 2012, the tumultuous two-year relationship between Carrell and his girlfriend, Ringenburg, began its…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- RICHARD C. JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Girma Aboye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Thurman N. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Myron O'Neal Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.