Weyl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The defendant owns and operates a line of double-track railway between the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis. At the station called “Merriam Park,” in the first-named city, there is a spur track running west of the station-house, terminating at the east line of Cleveland avenue, which avenue- crosses appellant’s tracks at right angles. Upon this spur track, and near the avenue, there stood 10 or 12 box-cars at the time of the accident herein involved. An employe of - the plaintiffs, driving a pair of mules attached to a lumber-wagon, attempting to cross the tracks on Cleveland avenue, was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knobloch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Headley v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Perry v. TozerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.