Legal Opinion

Weyl v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The defendant owns and operates a line of double-track railway between the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis. At the station called “Merriam Park,” in the first-named city, there is a spur track running west of the station-house, terminating at the east line of Cleveland avenue, which avenue- crosses appellant’s tracks at right angles. Upon this spur track, and near the avenue, there stood 10 or 12 box-cars at the time of the accident herein involved. An employe of - the plaintiffs, driving a pair of mules attached to a lumber-wagon, attempting to cross the tracks on Cleveland avenue, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knobloch v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Headley v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Perry v. TozerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Carlson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API