Sudzus v. Department of Employment Security
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toomin
In this appeal, we confront the question of whether a nonattorney’s representation of an employer at an unemployment benefits hearing constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. Plaintiff, Michael A. Sudzus, appeals from the circuit court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Review of the Illinois Department of Employment Security, which denied Sudzus’ claim for unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, Sudzus asserts that (1) his former employer, Butterfield Electric, Inc. (Butterfield), engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by participating in the referee’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Petrovic v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- Grafner v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- WISAM 1, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Wolin v. The Department of Financial and Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Stone Street Partners, LLC v. City of Chicago Department of Administrative HearingsIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.