Legal Opinion

Otten v. Works

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1974No. 5399PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from summary judgment that plaintiff’s cause of action against defendant is barred by the Two-Year Statute of Limitations, and that plaintiff take nothing.

Plaintiff Often sued defendant Works alleging plaintiff loaned $1200. to defendant on March 30, 1970; that such loan was to be repaid only upon demand by plaintiff; that plaintiff demanded payment on July 16, 1973 and again on August 25, 1973; that defendant refused to pay such loan. Plaintiff attached a copy of his letter of July 16, 1973 demanding payment; a copy of his attorney’s letter of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. International Printing Pressmen & Assitant's Union of North America v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Naylor v. GutteridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Hester & Wise v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Leaverton v. Sunset Motor LinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zuvers v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API