Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1935No. File No. 6219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, brought this action against the state of North Dakota, the state tax commissioner and the state auditor for the purpose of recovering $55,580.58, which it is alleged plaintiff paid in excess of the income tax actually and legally due from it to the state of North Dakota for the years 1921 and 1922. The action is the result of a difference of opinion between the plaintiff and the then tax commissioner of North Dakota as to the proper basis of allocating or computing plaintiff’s income for taxation.

It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff made due…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Wallace v. HinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Richland County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. William Clairmont, Inc. v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ladish Malting Co. v. Stutsman County Ex Rel. Stutsman County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API