Legal Opinion

Schmiemann v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Insurance Companies are obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in an underlying action entitled Cubero v Schmiemann, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 25728/99, the defendants State Farm and Casualty Company and State Farm Insurance Companies appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated March 4, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment.

Order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Ingarra v. General Accident/PG InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Walker v. Erie Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Walker v. Erie Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API