Legal Opinion

Maurice Carter v. Mike Parris

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2018No. 17-5498PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THAPAR, Circuit Judge.

Maurice Carter pled guilty to a variety of sex crimes and received a twenty-year prison sentence. He now petitions for habeas relief. Carter alleges his attorneys were constitutionally ineffective for failing to make the best arguments for suppression of key evidence. Yet even if Carter's counsel had made different arguments, the end result in his case would have remained the same-the evidence against Carter would have come in. Therefore, we affirm the district court and deny Carter's habeas petition.

I

Near midnight on June 2, 2007, some residents of Smith County,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perley Winkler v. Mike ParrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. TrevinoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Beaver v. MackieDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Dickerson v. GenoveseDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API