Legal Opinion

R & S St. Rose Lenders v. Branch Banking

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2013No. 56640Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

million and hold it for a year. During that time, Centex could exercise its purchase option and buy the Property from St. Rose for $54 million. St. Rose's acquisition money came from three sources: (1) a promissory note payable to Colonial Bank, N.A. (Colonial) in the amount of $29 million secured by a first-priority deed of trust against the Property (the Purchase Loan); (2) nonrefundable deposits in the amount of $8 million from Centex; and (3) a promissory note payable to R&S Lenders in the amount of $12 million secured by a deed of trust against the Property that was recorded after the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sheehan & Sheehan v. Nelson Malley & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Caires v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API