Legal Opinion

Yamada v. Nobel Biocare Holding AG

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 12, 2011No. 2:10-cv-04849-JHN-PLAxPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [48]

JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, District Judge.

The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jason Yamada, D.D.S.’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Class Certification and to Appoint Class Representative and Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket 48.) The Court previously deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The allegations below are culled from the First…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  2. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  3. Terrill v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API