Pierkowskie v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, beneficiaries of a life insurance policy, sued the defendant to recover under the double indemnity provisions of the policy. The beneficiaries recovered a judgment for the full amount sought. The defendant has appealed and the substance of its objection to the judgment lies in its assertion that the District Judge adopted an attitude deliberately inimical to the defendant and constituted himself an advocate for the plaintiff. Other grounds of error are alleged which will be discussed in this opinion, but the serious charge laid against the District Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hicks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. DoerksenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Sweeney v. Blue Anchor Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Gillman v. Media, Middletown, Aston & Chester Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Harold FeatherstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kramer D. Arnold, Administrator of the Estate of Howard A. Brown, Deceased v. Emily F. Loose, of the Estate of Warren L. Loose, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Ranger, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.