Legal Opinion
Harshman v. Well Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1964No. Civ. A. Nos. 64-380, 64-381, 64-465PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
These consolidated actions are for the recovery of unpaid overtime compensation which the plaintiffs allege is due them under the provisions of § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207. Section 13(b) (1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 213(b) (1), provides an exemption from the maximum hours and overtime requirements of § 7 as regards “any employee with respect to whom the Interstate Commerce Commission has power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of section 304 of Title 49”. It appears that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Southland Gasoline Co. v. BayleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Curtis BalvenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Friedrich v. U.S. Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Allen v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Sinclair v. Beacon Gasoline Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976
- Turk v. Buffets, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Friedrich v. U.S. Computer ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.