Legal Opinion
Pullum v. Hudson Foods, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1994No. 19068PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Employer appeals from an award allowing benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission determined that the employee’s injury resulted from an “accident arising out of and in the course of ... employment.” See § 287.120.1, RSMo Supp.1993. Employer contends that the award was improper because the employee “was injured as a result of her instigation of horseplay ... contrary to the rules of her employer.” 1
The scope of our review is stated in Mo. Const. Art. V, § 18 and § 287.495, RSMo1986. From them and their predecessors certain…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Page v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Blissenbach v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dillard v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ikerman v. KochSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Bare v. Wayne Poultry Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Searcy v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Anderson v. Noel T. Adams Ambulance DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- McCormack v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Simmons v. Bob Mears Wholesale FloristMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.