Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Cone Mills Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1985No. 8510IC144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff filed his claim within the time prescribed by G.S. 97-58, which provides:(b) . . . The time of notice of an occupational disease shall run from the date that the employee has been advised by competent medical authority that he has same.

*157(c) The right to compensation for occupational disease shall be barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after death, disability, or disablement as the case may be ... .

This two year statute of limitation is a condition precedent with which a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PURITAN/CHURCHILL CHEMICAL COMPANY v. EubankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Rutledge v. Stroh CompaniesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Johnston v. DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Johnston v. Duke University Medical CenterNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2009
  5. Rimmer v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API