Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Stroh Companies

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1992No. 9110IC298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is the Industrial Commission erred in denying plaintiff’s claim on the grounds that it was barred by the statute of limitations in G.S. 97-58(c). Plaintiff argues he filed his claim within two years of receiving notice of the nature and work-related cause of the disease. Furthermore, plaintiff contends that even if he had been put on notice of his disease more than two years prior to filing his claim, the additional requirement of “disability" had not been met at that time, and therefore, the statute of limitations has not run.

G.S.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Underwood v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rimmer v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Rimmer v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API