DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Motion In Limine; Electronic Discovery; Electronically Stored Information; Amendments to Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 and 37; Rule 37(c); Fed. R. Evid. 1006.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion in limine, seeking to exclude from the record data produced after the close of discovery and alleged summaries.1 For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is denied.
Background2
In this action, Plaintiffs claim that the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) underpaid for dialysis services Plaintiffs provided pursuant to both express contracts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Conoco Inc. (Formerly Continental Oil Co.) v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Jade Trading, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016