Legal Opinion

Lockett & Williams v. Gress Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1911No. 2538PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Tifton — Judge R. Eve. February 11, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The Gress Manufacturing Company obtained an injunction against Lockett & Williams as codefendants with one Bell, enjoining them from eutting timber upon certain lands which Lockett & Williams had purchased from Bell. The judgment granting the injunction was reversed by the Supreme Court. Bell v. Gress Mfg. Co., 127 Ga. 15 (55 S. E. 1043). Thereupon Lockett & Williams brought the present action against the Gress Manufac*773turing Company to recover damages on account of the alleged malicious prosecution of the above-stated ease. Upon the conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiffs the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. Gress Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Tyler v. Central Charge Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Stewart v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Impey v. ClitheroMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Haverty Furniture Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API