Legal Opinion

Application of Gene O. Sinex

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6834PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 8 and 9 of appellant’s application 1 for patent for a “LIQUID RECONCENTRATING APPARATUS.” Both claims were rejected as unpaten-table over Harris 2 the only cited prior art reference.

Appellant’s invention is disclosed as embodied in a reeoncentrator for liquid dehydrating agents employed in a “field dehydrator” which is alleged to have particular utility when used to remove moisture from natural gas at the well head. Appellant explains this use in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Application of Joseph F. SebaldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  3. Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  4. Application of Wilhelm E. Walles, William F. Tousignant and Thomas Houtman, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API