Application of Gene O. Sinex
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Appellant has appealed from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 8 and 9 of appellant’s application 1 for patent for a “LIQUID RECONCENTRATING APPARATUS.” Both claims were rejected as unpaten-table over Harris 2 the only cited prior art reference.
Appellant’s invention is disclosed as embodied in a reeoncentrator for liquid dehydrating agents employed in a “field dehydrator” which is alleged to have particular utility when used to remove moisture from natural gas at the well head. Appellant explains this use in his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of Alvin E. NehrenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Joseph F. SebaldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Application of Wilhelm E. Walles, William F. Tousignant and Thomas Houtman, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.