Insley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On original submission, this case was remanded for the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky,476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and Ex parteBranch, 526 So.2d 609 (1987). Insley v. State, 591 So.2d 589,690 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991).
At that hearing, the appellant's counsel, who was not trial counsel and who admitted that he was not present for the jury voir dire and the selection of the jury, argued that the prosecution used its peremptory strikes against two of the three black veniremembers. The prosecutor who tried the case argued that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Yeomans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- McPherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993