Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1990No. 89-1472PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the second time that this case has been before this Court on certiorari review. The defendant, Joe Louis Harrell, was convicted in Mobile Circuit Court of possession of cocaine and other offenses. Harrell challenged his conviction in the Court of Criminal Appeals, based upon the rule of law stated inBatson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case with instructions for the trial court to determine whether the guidelines of Batson, as interpreted by this Court in Ex parteBranch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala. 1987), had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. United States v. Lowden DavidCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Farrior v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API