Legal Opinion

State v. Hare

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1955No. 507PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The question to be determined is whether the petitioner is entitled to his release since he is being held under a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty of an offense for which he has never been indicted. The indictment with respect to robbery only charged that the defendants, with the threatened use of certain firearms, to-wit: a pistol, attempted to take personal property, etc. Robbery with firearms is not charged.

We have repeatedly held that the purpose and intent of the Legislature in enacting G.S. 14-87 was to provide for more severe punishment for the commission of robbery when such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API