Legal Opinion

State v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

IndiotmeNt for murcier, tried at Fall Term, 1896, of FranKlin Superior Court, before Graham, J., and a jury. The defendant was convicted and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Furches, J.:

This is an indictment for murder, and tie judge trying the case ordered a special venire and directed that it should be drawn from the jury box, under Section 1739 of The Code. In drawing this jury, upon the testimony of the sheriff and others, the judge undertook to try and determine who were and who were not freeholders. And when the name of J. H. King was drawn from the box, the judge found from the testimony of these parties, and from the fact that the tax books did not show that said King had listed any land for taxation, that he was not a freeholder, and rejected his name…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. . OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . VarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. State v. . LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. . NipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. State v. LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. . KinsaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API