Wilbanks Securities, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) filed by Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company. Plaintiffs responded by conceding that dismissal of Nationwide Insurance Company is appropriate, without prejudice, but arguing that their claims against Defendant Scottsdale should be permitted to proceed. The parties filed replies and sur-replies in support of their respective positions. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court finds as follows.
Plaintiffs filed this action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Paul Holt Drilling, Inc., and Paul Holt, an Individual v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- W & J Rives, Inc. v. Kemper Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Batsakis v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Advantage Medical Electronics, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Origis USA v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025