Legal Opinion

Salem Nursery, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff, a commercial nursery specializing in raising azalea plants, did not report its azalea inventory on its personal property tax return for 1969. The county assessor, after notice to plaintiff, placed all the plaintiff’s azalea plants which were in pots, in flats, or balled on the 1969-70 assessment roll at a true cash value of $10,000 as of January 1, 1969.

On plaintiff’s appeal to the Department of Revenue and the Tax Court, the action of the assessor was affirmed. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts, including the value of $10,000 placed on the property by the assessor, are not disputed.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Julius Roehrs Co. v. DIV. OF TAX APPEALS, DEPT. OF TREASURYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. STATE Ex Rel MEDFORD PEAR CO. v. FOWLEROregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Oyster Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1978
  2. Benton v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API