Legal Opinion

State v. Amelio

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 22, 2008No. A-92 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we decide whether a telephone call to a police dispatcher by a seventeen-year-old reporting that her father was drunk and driving provided a constitutional basis to stop defendant’s vehicle. We hold that under the circumstances presented there was reasonable and articulable suspicion of an offense to support a constitutional motor vehicle stop by the police.

I

The parties stipulated to the facts for the purpose of deciding defendant Paul Amelio’s motion to suppress the evidence resulting from the motor vehicle stop. Specifically, the parties accepted the facts as presented in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. State v. PineiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. State v. BasilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Trott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. State v. RoybalUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Trautmann v. ChristieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API