Legal Opinion
Di Mauro v. Aetna Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 14, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
On March 27th, 1929, the plaintiff purchased from a motor sales company an automobile truck under a conditional bill of sale, paid a portion of the price at the time and agreed to pay the balance in eighteen monthly instalments. The contract of sale provided that the sales company might insure the truck against fire and theft for its own protection and the protection of its assignee and the purchaser, that the plaintiff would pay the premium for the insurance upon demand and that on his failure to pay it, it was to be secured by the contract. The amount the plaintiff agreed to pay the sales…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Popowicz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Holbrook v. Baloise Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cutler v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
- Marsh v. Zurich Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Marsh v. Zurich Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Marsh v. Zurich Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968