Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Smith
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 1, 1965No. File No. CV 18-6305-0990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The plaintiff sues to recover certain alleged overpayments made by it to the defendant under a group medical payments policy of insurance. The essential facts alleged in the amended complaint are admitted by the defendant in her answer thereto, which denies only those allegations necessary to raise the only issue in the case, namely, the interpretation of the policy of insurance. The court has formulated this memorandum of decision in the form of a finding pursuant to § 993 of the Practice Book.
I
The following facts are found:
1. The plaintiff is a corporation, organized and existing under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Starks v. Hospital Service Plan of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Barker v. Coastal States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Kyte v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance CompaniesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Underhill v. BennettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967