Legal Opinion

Sayadoff v. Warda

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1954No. Civ. 15832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit rendered after plaintiff’s opening statement to a jury.

The action was based on a conspiracy by defendant paramour to commit assaults and battery upon plaintiff by committing abortions on her and rendering her sterile and causing permanent damage to her female organs and causing her extreme mental suffering.

Upon motion for nonsuit after opening statement it is unquestioned that “all favorable inferences reasonably to be drawn therefrom, must be accepted by the court as facts which would have been proved if the ease had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Miller v. BennettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Goldnamer v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Milliken v. HeddesheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Delia S. v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Kindt v. KauffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Peskin v. SquiresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API