Legal Opinion
Rheinboldt v. Fuston
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1929No. 3218PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
Appellee recovered verdict and judgment of $4,500 for injuries sustained by him in a collision on the streets of Roswell.
Appellant’s contentions are (varying the order of presentation) that the evidence does not support the general verdict nor the special findings; that the court erred in giving certain instruction, and that evidence as to appellee’s life expectancy was erroneously received.
As is usual in this class of cases, the evidence was highly conflicting. We have but to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Candelaria v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. DavissonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Gallegos v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
- Thayer v. Denver & R. G. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferret v. FerretNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Kiker v. Bank Sav. Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Kirkpatrick v. McMillanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Mozley v. RinehartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Trebnick v. GordonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.