Thayer v. Denver & R. G. R.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Sauta Fe County; Leaky, Judge. Action by Fred W. Thayer against the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company. General verdict for plaintiff, defendant’s motion for judgment on the special interrogatories and' answers thereto sustained, and judgment entered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP TI-IE COURT
ROBERTS, J.
This is the second appeal in this case, the former opinion being reported in 21 N. M. 330, 154 Pac. 691. There a judgment in favor of the appellant in this case was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. After remand ' to the district court, Thayer amended his complaint so as to state a cause of action under the Safety Appliance Act of 1893 (Act Cong. March 2, 1893, e. 196, 27 Stat. 531 [U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8605-8612]) as amended by tbe Act of Congress of April 14, 1910, c. 160, 36 Stat. 298 (S. S. Comp. St. §§ 8617-8619, 8621-8623), and the federal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chandler v. BattenfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Ballard v. Sacramento Northern Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bryant v. HB Lynn Drilling CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.