Legal Opinion
Man-Seok Choe v. Torres
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2008No. 06-56634PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We consider whether the district court erred in denying Man-Seok Choe’s habeas corpus petition challenging certification of his extradition to the Republic of Korea.
Facts
Choe is a Korean citizen and a resident of Los Angeles. In the 1990s, he traveled frequently to Korea on business, where he was acquainted with important political figures. During one of his visits to Korea, Choe learned that he was under criminal investigation. Choe thereupon left Korea in secret and returned to Los Angeles. After Korea requested Choe’s extradition, the United States took him…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Jerry J. Enomoto, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Reza Emami v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Federal Republic of Germany, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Wilfried Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Golden Gate Restaurant v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Sainez v. VenablesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McKnight v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In re the Extradition of HandanovićDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.