Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kizer v. Finch

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 8, 1998No. 2970096Published

1ConcurrenceMonroe, Judge

I agree with Judge Thompson’s opinion.- I write only to point out that this case, as it stood when it came before us, serves to strongly emphasize an issue regarding punitive damages. The jury awarded Finch $60,-000, a portion if not all of which appears to have been punitive damages for her abuse of process claim. The jury returned a general verdict, therefore, it did not designate a specific amount for compensatory damages and a specific amount for punitive damages. The compensatory damages appear to have been minimal, however.

Recently, some justices of the Alabama Supreme Court have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Fuller v. Preferred Risk Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API