Legal Opinion

People v. Cheek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of defendant’s contentions requires reversal. Although at times the prosecutor’s summation exceeded fair comment, it was not so egregious that it deprived defendant of a fair trial, particularly since the court sustained several of defense counsel’s objections and gave curative instructions (see, People v Mohammed, 151 AD2d 1018, 1019, lv denied 74 NY2d 815). Defendant has failed to preserve his contention regarding the court’s charge on reasonable doubt and, in any event, when viewed in its entirety, the charge conveyed to the jury the proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MohammedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. LuisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. DworakowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. SchrammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. RuffuleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API