Legal Opinion

Knox v. Knox

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1970No. 25862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Justice.

1. In the plaintiff father’s habeas, corpus action against his divorced wife for the custody of their nine-year-old daughter, the applicable law is Code § 74-107 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 110, as amended), rather than Code § 50-121. Harwell v. Gay, 186 Ga. 80, 84 (196 SE 758); Fort v. Alewine, 223 Ga. 359, 361 (155 SE2d 12).

2. The provision of Code Ann. § 74-107, as to no prima facie right to the custody of the child in the father, did not enlarge the rights of third parties, which are governed by Code § 50-121. Hill v. Rivers, 200 Ga. 354, 362 (37 SE2d 386). “While, as between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloan v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Hill v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Harwell v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Fort v. AlewineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Drummond v. Fulton County Department of Family & Children ServicesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Robert George Drummond and Mildred Pauline Drummond v. Fulton County Department of Family and Children's Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API