Knox v. Knox
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Justice.
1. In the plaintiff father’s habeas, corpus action against his divorced wife for the custody of their nine-year-old daughter, the applicable law is Code § 74-107 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 110, as amended), rather than Code § 50-121. Harwell v. Gay, 186 Ga. 80, 84 (196 SE 758); Fort v. Alewine, 223 Ga. 359, 361 (155 SE2d 12).
2. The provision of Code Ann. § 74-107, as to no prima facie right to the custody of the child in the father, did not enlarge the rights of third parties, which are governed by Code § 50-121. Hill v. Rivers, 200 Ga. 354, 362 (37 SE2d 386). “While, as between the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sloan v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Hill v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Harwell v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Fort v. AlewineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Drummond v. Fulton County Department of Family & Children ServicesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Robert George Drummond and Mildred Pauline Drummond v. Fulton County Department of Family and Children's Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.