Legal Opinion

Advanced Choices, Inc. v. State Department of Health Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 2010No. B210116PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANEY, J.

Plaintiff Advanced Choices, Inc. (Advanced Choices), submitted bills to and received remittances paid through the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by defendant State Department of Health Services (the Department). Advanced Choices was not a Medi-Cal provider and was ineligible to participate in the program. When the Department discovered the facts, it demanded return of $1,454,840.10. Advanced Choices sought formal proceedings, which were held before an administrative law judge of the Department’s Office of Administrative Hearings and Appeals (OAHA). The OAHA issued a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. US Ecology, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Coalition for Student Action v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Day v. ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTERCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. McComber v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pac. Bay Recovery, Inc. v. Cal. Physicians' Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Alioto v. HoilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  4. Aceves v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. 3074 Centreville LLC v. M.A. Cohen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API