Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Raghuveer Nayak

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 2014No. 14-1404PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Raghuveer Nayak pled guilty to mail fraud after federal authorities learned that he had been secretly bribing physicians in exchange for referrals to his outpatient surgery centers.. As permitted by his plea agreement, Nayak now appeals, claiming that his indictment was legally insufficient because the government did not allege that his conduct caused or was intended to cause tangible harm to any of the referring physicians’ patients. Because actual or intended tangible harm is not an element of the offense of honest-services mail fraud, we affirm.

I. Background

Nayak owned…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence DolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Andrew GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Reginald WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. David WeimertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Ryan MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. CorriganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. GrossDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API