Strompolos v. Premium Readers Service
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
The issue presented by defendant's motion for summary judgment is whether Section 226.1 et seq. of Volume 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations (otherwise known as and hereinafter referred to as Regulation Z) is a regulation constitutionally promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board within the scope of .the authority granted to it by the Truth in Lending Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. For the reasons stated below, we resolve this issue in the affirmative and therefore deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
This…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Marguerite B. KilbornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- ELGIN, JOLIET AND EASTERN RAILWAY CO. v. Benj. Harris & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Gerlach v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
- Joseph v. Norman's Health Club, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
- Kriger v. European Health Spa, Inc., of Milwaukee, Wis.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973
- Herby Berryhill and Lucille Berryhill v. Rich Plan of Pensacola, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.