Legal Opinion

Bales v. FCA US LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 21, 2019No. 4:19-cv-04798Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JAMES C. BALES, No. C 19-04798 WHA 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. AMENDED ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS 13 FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability AND MOTION TO STRIKE, company, and DOES 1–10, inclusive, AND ORDER TO REASSIGN 14 CASE TO MAGISTRATE Defendants. JUDGE (BY CONSENT) 15 / 16 INTRODUCTION* 17 In this defective product action, defendant moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) and 18 19 moves to strike under Rule 12(f). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is DENIED 20 and the motion to strike…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API