Legal Opinion

Hoffmeister v. Oaktree Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant Oaktree Homes, Inc. (Oaktree Homes) that factual issues exist whether the area where plaintiff was working, a cross beam lying across concrete foundation walls and situated some 8 to 12 feet above the basement floor, constituted part of the work place within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) and whether plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker.

Plaintiff was employed by third-party defendant, J.E.B. Contracting, to move a modular home and place it on foundation walls. A wooden structure had been built on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hagins v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Madigan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Hagins v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Cimato Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Johnson v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Peterson v. Barry, Bette & Led Duke, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API