Hoffmeister v. Oaktree Homes, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant Oaktree Homes, Inc. (Oaktree Homes) that factual issues exist whether the area where plaintiff was working, a cross beam lying across concrete foundation walls and situated some 8 to 12 feet above the basement floor, constituted part of the work place within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) and whether plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker.
Plaintiff was employed by third-party defendant, J.E.B. Contracting, to move a modular home and place it on foundation walls. A wooden structure had been built on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hagins v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Madigan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hagins v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. Cimato Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Johnson v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Peterson v. Barry, Bette & Led Duke, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996